
TikTok has promised to bring a legal challenge against the law that was signed by President Joe Biden on Wednesday…Experts expect its main arguments to center on alleged violations of its own First Amendment rights and those of its 170 million US users. But it won’t be an easy fight since judges often hesitate to make decisions of national security importance where the legislature has so forcefully weighed in.
If only this case involved some sort of nexus test that properly balanced free speech rights with matters of national security. Maybe then the Supreme Court would step in, say “Screw Congressional intent!” and side with big business. I’m sorry, I’m still hung up on the Sackett decision.
The TikTok case has to hit the lower courts before Thomas and Alito see it though, so the point about Congressional deference still stands. Anyone who has sat through a war powers module in a Con Law class could tell you that when Congress does a thing for the sake of “national security,” pretty much anything is fair game. Like, anything. Considering that TikTok has openly been demonized as a tool China uses to funnel propaganda toward impressionable Americans:
they’re going to ban tiktok and hire mckinsey to help them understand why the 18-34 polling on israel-palestine isn’t budging https://t.co/iXaPZvqTfY
— vibe instructor✌🏾🐝 (@Vanessa_ABee) April 25, 2024
It really isn’t that much of a stretch to frame the justification for the ban in war terms, namely stopping a foreign nation’s psychological combat campaign. Is that a bunk position? Probably, but judges also have a habit of taking national security at its word when legal arguments are made.
The Legal Challenges That Lie Ahead For TikTok — In Both The US And China [The Verge]

